If you are a beginner, you also have to be familiar with some of their specialized moves and their “alternative” functions when you advance their moves in the game.Ĭhess is a game of strategy which requires critical thinking and enough skill, understanding, and mastery of all the moves and functions of each chess piece. That is precisely what I teach my daughter when it comes to the chess pieces, positions, and its moves. When I started learning how to play chess, I was taught first to be familiar with the different pieces, their respective positions in the chessboard and their basic moves. Sorry, just kidding now, but I agree, some histories of names are nice to know, take " Orang-Utan " or "Santastiere's Folly" "Blackburne Shilling Gambit", " Anti - Neo - Orthodox ", "Counter-Thrust" and even the " Fingerslip Variation ". Those lists were just put together by some fanatic some day and don't really have any legitimacy. However, no serious player uses such names, people only talk about the Open Sicilian and its subvariations (Najdorf, Dragon, et cetera). It gives a name to 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6, another to 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6, et cetera. There are lists of names floating around on the Internet with names for the strangest things. Names do change - fifteen years ago or so, there were the Richter/Rauzer, the Sozin and the Boleslavsky, but they weren't together called the Classical Sicilian yet. It'll be "official" if someone writes a book on it, but there are plenty of books that use conflicting names. It's tedious to keep referring to the move, and when a variation is talked about often enough, some name will stick. They're just habits, if enough people use a name then that is the variation's name.Īnd why do people need names? They use them when they talk about a variation a lot. Opening names aren't official in any way, and they differ from country to country. Ill it not be better if there is some naming convention used for the openings so that it would be better for everyone to understand why a specific name is given for a specific opening variation. Sorry, just kidding now, but I agree, some histories of names are nice to know, take " Orang-Utan " or "Santastiere's Folly" "Blackburne Shilling Gambit", " Anti - Neo - Orthodox ", "Counter-Thrust" and even the "Fingerslip Variation ". " I now play the Inverted Cracow Variation of the Reversed Abrahams Attack against your Wild Mariotti Defence in this Double Folkestone Opening I hope you play the Neo Calabrian Counter Gambit now instead of that Closed Lisitsin Counter Attack ! " Why, by the way, should it be "better" to understand the history of a name ? I never heard somebody in OTB games say. I quote : in 1932 FIDE set up a commission to produce a standard set of names, but the result was largely ignored.Īnother attempt was made in 1965 through FIDE Revue, but there have been movements 1) away from the use of names and 2) towards systematic classification. This is not the first forum on opening names, and I remember having answered at that time that in The Oxford Companion to Chess over 1300 names are given with the opening moves, moreover a lot of alternative names and, most important for you, the sources of almost every name.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |